šŸŒ³ Evergreen noteworthy

Think with Google, revisiting Google's website speed testing tool.

planted on in: Tools and Resources, Review, Google, Testing and Website Optimisation.
~853 words, about a 5 min read.

Just over a year ago I reviewed testmysite.withgoogle.com (here) which was at that time making the rounds around various blogger groups. My conclusion then was that the new "tool" has a distinctively dodgy feel to it and felt as though it was largely a marketing funnel designed to ensnare non-technical savvy middle management types.

While I conceded that I am certainly not the tools target audience I felt it disingenuous that once it had provided you with largely meaningless results there was the suggestion that a hidden more detailed report could be obtained via email. This excuse to harvest emails for a marketing list is inexcusable and it was made worse by the fact that the emailed report was almost identical to the one displayed on the page.

Up to that point I had expected better of Google and the whole experience left me feeling as though the whole tool was a scam, or at least ethically questionable.

Test My Site With Google

A year later and upon revisiting the website it has an improved design aesthetic and is very much branded as a Google "product." There are two links near the bottom of the page one informs you that this tool is powered by Web Page Test and the other a link for "Experienced developers" directs to a Google article that largely lectures on the why as opposed to the how but is an interesting read regardless.


Upon entering PhotoGabble's url into the inviting input field and hitting return I am quickly presented with an "are you human" test that I somehow fail a number of times before finally my browser loads a visually appealing results page.

The three grades out of one hundred are gone, now replaced instead with three segments navigated to by use of a horrendous scroll-jacking that appears to disable your scroll wheel. The first segment, seen above, focuses on the mobile loading time over 3G which I am quite proud to say is an excellent three whole seconds for PhotoGabble.


The next segment shows what is supposed to be a comparison with what I can only assume is an industrial average for the category that Google have placed the tested website into. However while the information bubble does clarify that it has been "calculated based upon internal Google study of over five million web pages" the data in this segment gives you no more insight than the first as it is simply repeating what has already been said.

The only new information that the second segment provides is the category that Google have placed the tested website into. In the case of PhotoGabble, Google thinks it is in the Computers & Consumer electroncis industry which given the alternatives is the best fit.


Finally we come to the third and last segment. For PhotoGabble this segment gives no further details other than an "atta-boy", but for less performant websites it does provide an estimated reduction in loading time with some suggested fixes in a modal window as shown below.


You may have already noticed what all the above screen-grabs have in common and that is the giant call to action screaming to be clicked. Doing so reveals the below modal window that kindly informs you that the only way to retrieve the detailed results is to subscribe to their marketing list.


Not wanting to add additional burden to my personal email address I spun up the every so handy Guerrilla Mail for a disposable temporary email address and waited about 40 minutes to receive my report.

In the past year this "speed testing" tool from Google has changed although the changes are largely cosmetic in nature with a switch in reporting methodology away from mobile usability, towards potential visitor loss caused due to slow loading time. What has not changed is that the whole tool is a front for harvesting email addresses and just like last time the emailed report is basically a rehashing of what is contained on the web report.

The focus on estimated visitor loss due to slow loading times speaks to management and business owners a lot louder than it does to engineers or programmers in general and it is the former that this "tool" is most certainly aimed at. While I strongly disagree with its email harvesting tactic I do feel that as web developers we should use this and tools like it that are targeted towards non-tech-savvy people as a way of opening up discussion on making our websites better; because while the reports provided by services such as Web Page Test are extremely detailed they are confusing and often scary to the very people that testmysite.withgoogle.com has been designed to communicate with and comfort.

Page History

This page was first added to the repository on March 21, 2021 in commit 83e1321a and has since been amended 5 times. View the source on GitHub.

  1. refactor(#304): move files into src folder
  2. feat(#108): removes categories in favour of tags (topics)
  3. feat(#108): moved content into digital garden structure and began work on content type pagination
  4. refactor: add growthStage meta to posts
  5. refactor :: update all img src to point to new path